Center, For In this lesson, hopefully you gained some tools for how to approach the task. Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. There are also a small number of non-CC licenses that have been designated as CC Compatible Licenses for ShareAlike purposes. Using that definition, material licensed under CC BY or BY-SA is a free cultural work. [75] Apps and drivers of Android, which provide an increasing amount of Android's functionality, have been gradually relicensed from permissive to proprietary licenses. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. We will look at those next. Learn how and when to remove this template message, Learn how and when to remove these template messages, Common Development and Distribution License, GNU General Public License § Compatibility and multi-licensing, Comparison of free and open-source software licenses, "How GPLv4 tackles license proliferation". [58], An early example of a project that successfully re-licensed for license incompatibility reasons is the Mozilla project and their Firefox browser. If the underlying work is licensed with BY-SA or BY-NC-SA, your adapter’s license must be the same license applied to the original or a license that is designated as compatible with the original license. CC BY. Once you’ve gone copyleft, you cannot go back (on a given work). “Combination of chilies” by City Foodsters is licensed under CC BY 2.0. When using the chart, you can determine which license to use for your adaptation by choosing the more restrictive of the two licenses on the works you are combining. Icons by The Noun Project. Creative Commons licenses also serve an important purpose: they allow creators to modify and designate usage of copyrighted works. The NC condition means that certain kinds of uses are prohibited by the license, limiting what kind of reuses can be made from the work. Copyleft? Creative Commons licenses range from more strict to more open, like public domain. 1 License Compatibility Chart 2 Remix works with a NonCommercial building block 3 Remix work with a NoDerivative building block 4 Downloads License Compatibility Chart Choose two works you wish to combine or remix. BY-SA 4.0, or a later version of the BY-SA license. In a world of Tik Tok duets, sampled music, GIFs, and unaccredited images cramming Instagram feeds, how do you find out what type of license governs the use of a creative work? It only takes a minute to sign up. This Adapters License Chart chart may be a helpful guide. [23][24], An example of a license that has excellent compatibility with other FOSS licenses is the Artistic License 2.0, due to its re-licensing clause which allows redistribution of the source code under any other FOSS license. It is good to be well-apprised of what the fine print of a specific license really is before choosing that as your permanent, irrevocable license, and it is equally important to make sure a “CC licensed work” is actually licensed for CC use by the original creator. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. That way, you can . An example of an education adaptation would be an open textbook chapter that weaves together multiple open educational resources in such a way that the reader can’t tell which resource was used on which page. Is 'infodumping' the important parts of a story via an in-universe lesson in school/documentary/the news/other educational medium bad storytelling? Adaptation (or derivative work, as it is called in some parts of the world) is a term of art in copyright law. Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions. Creative Commons licenses range from more strict to more open, like public domain. Offices, Woodruff Health Sciences But Creative Commons exists not just to create copyright licenses, but also to encourage the creation of a thriving commons through sharing knowledge. While traditional copyright can feel too strict, it is good to remember that its original function is to protect artist’s rights. However, your copyright only extends to the new contributions you made to the work. A re-user who opts for the latter may . [77][78] Also in 2014, Gang Garrison 2 was re-licensed from GPLv3 to MPL for improved library compatibility. (Usually, under the same license, but there may be other compatible licenses in the future.). The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license is better suited for wikis; the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) was designed for software manuals. This violates the fourth Freedom Defined requirement. For example, you can select and arrange pre-existing poems published by others into an anthology, write an introduction, and design a cover for the collection, but your copyright and the only copyright you can license extends to your arrangement of the poems (not the poems themselves), and your original introduction and cover.  supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights. The idea that CC is a simple way to skirt around the conventional “fine print” is simply incorrect. You must use version 1.0 for your contributions to adaptations of material under BY-NC-SA 1.0. 2.0 billion works and counting. School, Nondegree More and more people are flocking to the small screen to find daily entertainment. Creative Commons licenses are designed for ease of use. Does using Creative Commons No-Derivatives license conflict with GitHub terms? Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Introductory note: In many situations, such as reuse of a photo in a slide presentation, it is obvious that no adaptation has been created. CC does not recommend using a license if the corresponding box is yellow, although doing so is technically permitted by the terms of the license. Combining and adapting CC-licensed works is where things can get a little tricky. Why did my papers get repeatedly put on the last day and the last session of a conference? The great promise of Creative Commons licensing is that it increases the pool of content from which we can draw to create new works. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed. Many espouse the idea that Creative Commons licenses is a development that will usher us into a new Golden Age of a more free and creative human culture. Unit 4: Using CC Licenses and CC-Licensed Works, Creative Commons Certificate for Educators, Academic Librarians and GLAM, comply with the NonCommercial restriction, https://www.pexels.com/photo/strawberry-smoothie-on-glass-jar-775032/, https://creativecommons.org/about/downloads, Describe the basics of what it means to create an adaptation, Explain the scope of the ShareAlike clause, Explain the scope of the NoDerivatives clause, Identify what license compatibility means and how to determine whether licenses are compatible, Taking excerpts of a larger work. The ND license prevents others from remixing and building upon your work. [79][80], The KaiOS mobile operating system was derived from the Firefox OS/Boot to Gecko operating system, which was released under the permissive MPL 2.0. A Creative Commons license is a usage designation that is built on copyright, that allows for more flexibility on the use and reuse of a given work. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. Please let us know!). Like a smoothie, an adaptation / remix mixes material from different sources to create a wholly new creation: Attributions: “CC Smoothie” by Nate Angell. IANAL, but it seems to me that you cannot sublicense CC content under the Apache license. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates: Section 7 – Other Terms and Conditions. 1 Open Data Commons also has an Attribution license and the Public Domain Dedication and License - Rufus Pollock May 13, 2013 at 10:26 Add a comment 1 Answer Sorted by: 2 A good reason to not use MIT and BSD licenses for data is that they were written for software, so they're not a great fit. “Cultural works” is simply the term chosen by Freedom Defined to distinguish non-software works that should be under a free content license rather than a free software license. This license allows her fans to reuse her music as long as they 1) attribute her as the original creator, 2) don’t try to make any money off of it, and 3) that any copies also be licensed under the same type of license. Choose two works you wish to combine or remix. To help show more clearly what the different CC licenses let people do, CC marks the most permissive of its licenses as “Approved for Free Cultural Works.” When you apply these licenses to material you create, it meets the Freedom Defined definition of a “Free Cultural Work.” Free cultural works are the ones that can be most readily used, shared, and remixed by others, and go furthest toward creating a commons of freely reusable materials. 2. Many copyleft licenses explicitly allow relicensing under some other copyleft licenses. While it is commonly accepted that linking (static and even dynamic linking) constitutes a derivative of a strong copyleft'd work,[6][7][8][9] there are alternate interpretations. Or you can share your work, and help light up the global commons! It means creating something new from a copyrighted work that is sufficiently original to itself be protected by copyright. No-derivatives licenses are not compatible with any license, including themselves. The birth of the Creative Commons and Creative Commons licenses in the 2000’s helped encourage the remix culture of the 21st century. You can read more about that here. . BY-NC-SA 4.0, or a later version of the BY-NC-SA license. This can be achieved by separating the programs by an own process and allowing communication only via binary ABIs or other indirect means. Others in the FOSS domain, such as Eric S. Raymond, came to different conclusions regarding the requirements for re-licensing of an entire code base. [emphasis added]. This means that if you use a few lines from a poem to illustrate a poetry technique in an article you’re writing, your article is not an adaptation because your article is not derived from or based on the poem from which you took a few lines. I also want to say how proud and thankful I am for our two assistant coaches, Ina Jones and Gwen Blount. It also varies by jurisdiction and, even within a given jurisdiction, a judge’s determination between the two can be subjective, since there are few definitive rules on which to rely. The Creative Commons arose in the 2000s as a way to create a midpoint between the more strict copyright law of old, and a total lack of reservation of rights on a creative work. ", Given the multimillion dollar fiasco that Oracle just ran Google through based (ultimately) on. Once a license has been added to this list, it will not be removed. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The source code of Netscape's Communicator 4.0 browser was originally released in 1998 under the Netscape Public License/Mozilla Public License[59] but was criticised by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and OSI for being incompatible with the GNU General Public License (GPL). Freedom Defined has a longer explanation of the arguments against using NC licenses. If you are correct, then the code in answers on SO or any of the SE sites is unusable in a large number of projects. Remember that your rights in your adaptation only apply to your own contributions. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability. The threshold question is  whether an adaptation under copyright is created. [38][39], Another case where GPL compatibility is problematic is the CDDL licensed ZFS file system with the GPLv2 licensed Linux kernel. [40] Despite that both are free software under a copyleft license, ZFS is not distributed with most linux distros like Debian[41][42] (but is distributed with FreeBSD) as the CDDL is considered incompatible with the GPL'ed Linux kernel, by the Free Software Foundation and some parties with relations with the FSF. OER ist alles. If there is an “X” in the box, then the works may not be remixed unless an exception or limitation applies. How is the logarithm of an integer analogous to the degree of a polynomial? [69], The Free Software Foundation's GNU Free Documentation License version 1.2 is not compatible with the widely used Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, which was a problem for Wikipedia, for instance. Disclaimer. Creative Commons PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042 info@creativecommons.org; Read this explanation on the CC site about what constitutes an adaptation. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. CC BY. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License. Faculty and Staff. However, the determination can be more difficult when bringing together multiple works into one larger work. [20][self-published source? Your contributions to adaptations of BY-NC-SA 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 materials may only be licensed under: There is no compatibility mechanism in CC BY-NC-SA 1.0. Using Database licensed under Creative Commons Attribution v3, Looking for an example of using code with Apache License Version 2.0. [49], On October 8, 2015, Creative Commons concluded that the CC BY-SA 4.0 is inbound compatible with the GPLv3. [10][11], For combined works with "strong copyleft" modules, a stronger isolation is required. The birth of the Creative Commons and Creative Commons licenses in the 2000’s helped encourage the remix culture of the 21st century. [37] In 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation switched from the GFDL to a Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license as the main license for their projects. Creative Commons licenses do, however, carry a degree of risk on both ends. This "one-way compatibility" characteristic has been criticized by the Apache Foundation, which licenses under the more permissive Apache license,[22] such non-copyleft licenses being often less complicated and making for better license compatibility. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses. 577), We are graduating the updated button styling for vote arrows, Statement from SO: June 5, 2023 Moderator Action, What am I allowed to do programmatically with pictures that have a Creative Commons "don't modify" license. While we often think of these two as opposed to one another (Creative Commons license vs. copyright), Creative Commons copyright licenses are actually more like an additional layer of usage rights granted to copyrighted works. Your contributions to adaptations of BY-SA 4.0 materials may only be licensed under: Other licenses may be added to this list at any time according to the established process and criteria. Once a license has been added to this list, it will not be removed. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License. (Freedom Defined is an open organization of free culture advocates and researchers; the definition was developed by its community as a parallel to efforts such as the Free Software Definition, to have a standard for defining Free Culture.) This is not always easy to determine, though some bright lines do exist. [25], You may Distribute your Modified Version as Source (either gratis or for a Distributor Fee, and with or without a Compiled form of the Modified Version) [...] provided that you do at least ONE of the following: […], (c) allow anyone who receives a copy of the Modified Version to make the Source form of the Modified Version available to others under, (ii) a license that permits the licensee to freely copy, modify and redistribute the Modified Version using the same licensing terms that apply to the copy that the licensee received, and requires that the Source form of the Modified Version, and of any works derived from it, be made freely available in that license fees are prohibited but Distributor Fees are allowed. They make it significantly easier to create content rapidly without having to go through the traditional hurdles of applying and paying for individual applications for every single song, photo, or ten second audio tracks. Let’s look at what people say the benefits of using a more flexible license are for creators. [emphasis added]. While the benefits are obvious for those looking for content to remix or to obtain for a project without having to pay a license fee, the reviews are mixed on whether Creative Commons licenses are good for the original creator. Are interstellar penal colonies a feasible idea? [70][self-published source?] rev 2023.6.6.43481. In the chart below we show which licenses are compatible. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to: reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part; and. [44] In 2015, the CDDL to GPL compatibility question reemerged when the linux distribution Ubuntu announced that it would include OpenZFS by default. CC licenses are basically a way to say, “I’m flattered you want to use my work, and here are my terms.” They provide a vital tool to help creators engage with audiences while keeping their rights protected. It is the open source encyclopedia that is your first stop in writing a college essay – on the way to resources that you can actually quote in your paper. We think that in many contexts, this is best accomplished by using one of the free licenses, which place minimal restrictions on reuse. [8][30][31] If you tried to combine code released under either of the later GPL licenses with GPLv2 code, you would violate section 6 of GPLv2, the source of the incompatibility. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or. [39][72], Another interesting case was Google's re-licensing of GPLv2-licensed Linux kernel header files to the BSD license for their Android library Bionic. Derivative of “tv dinner 1″ by adrigu (https://flic.kr/p/6AMLDF) used under CC BY, and various Creative Commons license buttons by Creative Commons (https://creativecommons.org/about/downloads) used under CC BY. Here are some particular types of uses to consider (some of them should be familiar from earlier lessons! Icons by The Noun Project. You must use version 1.0 for your contributions to adaptations of material under BY-SA 1.0. Definitions [ edit] License compatibility can be defined around the concepts of "collective/combined/aggregated work" and "derivative work". Creative Commons evaluates licenses for ShareAlike compatibility according to its published process and criteria. [26][27][28][user-generated source?]. | De la victimización al "blaming the victim" en el mundo capitalista actual, El papa Francisco habla en su primera entrevista concedida a los medios (concretamente a la cadena española cuatro) sobre varios aspectos de su pontificado.

Darf Die Polizei 2 Tests Machen, Scandic Victoria Oslo, Drogen Augen Erkennen, 2 Icloud Accounts Auf Einem Mac, Articles C